Article

Reply to “Response: Board Composition and Firm Performance: Evidence from Bangladesh - A Sceptical View”

Authors: Afzalur Rashid (University of Southern Queensland) , Anura De Zoysa (University of Wollongong, Australia) , Sudhir Lodh (University of Wollongong, Australia) , Kathy Rudkin (University of Wollongong)

  • Reply to “Response: Board Composition and Firm Performance: Evidence from Bangladesh - A Sceptical View”

    Article

    Reply to “Response: Board Composition and Firm Performance: Evidence from Bangladesh - A Sceptical View”

    Authors: , , ,

Options

Abstract

This paper replies to Chowdhury’s (2010) response to the paper "Board Composition and Firm Performance: Evidence from Bangladesh" (2010). It challenges the strength of the criticisms, arguing that the factors discussed in Chowdhury (2010) do not necessarily impair the outcome of the research. The authors elucidate issues raised, and in so doing, reproduce the results incorporating the commentator’s suggestions.

Keywords: Board composition, independent directors, firm performance, Bangladesh

How to Cite:

Rashid, A., De Zoysa, A., Lodh, S. & Rudkin, K., (2012) “Reply to “Response: Board Composition and Firm Performance: Evidence from Bangladesh - A Sceptical View””, Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal 6(3), 121-131.

Downloads:
Download PDF

6 Views

709 Downloads

Published on
29 Sep 2012
License
All rights reserved